|

Macchi's MC.200 Saetta (Thunderbolt)
was one of the triumvirate of new fighter aircraft which entered Regia Aeronautica service in 1939. While the CR.42 was the last of the fighter biplanes, the MC.200 and the Fiat G.50 ushered in the age of
Italian metal monoplane fighters. While basically outclassed by its opponents,
the MC.200 saw considerable service in the Mediterranean and Eastern Fronts, and also provided much of the airframe for the
gorgeous MC.202, generally considered the best Italian fighter of World War II. The
aircraft featured in these photographs is on display at the United States Air Force Museum in Dayton, Ohio, and is one of
a very small number (perhaps 2?) of survivors of the type. This aircraft wears
the markings of the 372a Squadriglia, but operated by the 165a Squadriglia in North Africa. Captured near Benghazi in November 1942, this aircraft was sent to the United States for war bonds drives. Eventually, the aircraft was restored by Aermacchi for the USAF Museum. The photo above shows it in the Museum Annex in 1995, with a Douglas C-133 lurking over it. The plane is now on display in the Second World War Gallery of the main museum complex.

The MC.200 was, like the CR.42
and the G.50, powered by an 800 hp Fiat A74 radial engine. The cowling and propeller
can be seen in this shot, with details of the propeller boss clearly visible. The
copper-coloured engine cowl ring is prominent, and the straps which hold the cowling access panels can be seen going around
the cowling (one immediately behind the cowl ring, and the other further back underneath the aerodynamic bumps on the cowl
for the cylinder heads).

On the left side of the nose
can be seen the blast tubes for the twin 12.7mm Breda-SAFAT machine guns mounted above the cowl. These were the aircraft's only armament. The cowl flaps are
also visible, as is one of the unusual engine exhausts, which point straight down.

Incredibly, the MC.200 had an
open cockpit, in deference to the concerns of Italian pilots that visibility would be compromised by a full canopy. I feel sorry for the pilots who had to fly this plane over Stalingrad!
The rear portions of the canopy folded down to each side to allow pilot access to the cockpit.

The MC.200 had a wide-track landing
gear, which it passed on to the more developed MC.202. As can be seen here, the
landing gear design was quite simple.

This shot is looking towards
the aft of the main gear well. The retraction gear for the inner doors was quite
simple, and would close as the main wheels entered the bay. The forward portion
of the main gear well opened directly onto the engine accessories; the struts towards the top of the picture are part of the
engine bearers.

The tail of the MC.200 was also
passed on essentially unaltered to the MC.202 and later MC.205. This photo illustrates
the Cross of Savoy marking on the tail quite well, and also shows the elevator-down position the MC.200 seems to have taken
on the ground.

These photos, while not of outstanding quality, are included to show the colours
of the MC.200 cockpit. I took these shots in a Hail Mary style, over my head
and hoping for the best. The first of these photos shows the cockpit floor, with
the stick in the centre. The silver bar cutting across the middle are the rudder
pedals, with kidney-shaped plates underneath for the pilot's feet to rest on.

Another shot of the rudder pedals. Notice the corrugated construction
of most of the cockpit floor, and the support for the control column that the footplates are mounted on.

The right side of the rather sparse instrument panel is seen
here. Notice the large compass mounted underneath the gunsight.

A shot of the cockpit
sill, showing the gunsight and some portions of the instrument panel. The black
crackle finish on the instrument panel is very similar to that applied to US aircraft of the same period, while the interior
colour is reminiscent of the British interior gray-green.

Our final shot is of the right side of the cockpit. The engine ignition controls are mounted on a small panel; unlike many of its contemporaries, the MC.200
did not have proper side consoles.
I know this photo coverage is rather spotty, but I hope it is still of use to modelers working on one of the kits available
of this important Italian fighter. As well, many of these photos could help somebody
building an MC.202, since some of the details shown are common to both aircraft.
Return to Home
|